WSJ defeats Beijing

The WSJ China Bureau recently rose up against the almighty Dark Power, Darth Murdoch. Mr. M must have stepped on their toe somewhere and forgotten to say sorry?
No! Because Mr. M is plotting silence them to accelerate his dirty backdoor business with the evil CCP. And Mr. M has had a long slimy trail - so far as I know, ex-colonial viceroy Chris Patten claims so.
I wonder what is the difference between the WSJ and the papers of Mr. M. Maybe there are crucial differences in beliefs and credos, a considerable gap in taste, apart from other nuances and fine points. But what the use of these delicasies when it comes to the critical point like Iraq war (critical to Sadam, who would later be hanged, as well as to the people who would and still will perish in the ensuing civil war)?
Now they produced this article: why Beijing is defeated again (and again). It is about the so-called real-name registration system (for blogging). Anyone who has lived in China more than 3 months should know this kind of things come and go. There are a lot of similar stories. For example, roungs, and rounds, of internet bar crackdowns, the nationwide internet purification movement. The WSJ bureau, which is said to have the strongest stronghold of the free world press here, should know this. They either don't know it or pretend not. Or they just decided to get a "good" article out of the affair and basta.